Table 1. Summary of key phase III randomized trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of systemic therapies according to the etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma

Trial Treatment arms Subgroup based on etiology (n, %) Overall survival HR (95% CI) Progression-free survival HR (95% CI)
Immunotherapy: first line
 IMbrave150 [118] Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib Overall (501)HBV (240, 48%)HCV (108, 22%)Non-viral (153, 31%) 0.58 (0.42–0.79)0.51 (0.32–0.81)0.43 (0.22–0.87)0.91 (0.52–1.60) 0.59 (0.47–0.76)0.47 (0.33–0.67)0.69 (0.39–1.20)0.71 (0.47–1.08)
 COSMIC-312 [119] Atezolizumab plus cabozantinib vs. sorafenib Overall (649)HBV (190, 29%)HCV (202, 31%)Non-viral (257, 40%) 0.90 (0.69–1.18)0.53 (0.33–0.87)1.10 (0.72–1.68)1.18 (0.78–1.79) 0.63 (0.44–0.91)0.46 (0.29–0.73)0.64 (0.38–1.09)0.92 (0.60–1.41)
HIMALAYA [120] Tremelimumab plus durvalumab vs. sorafenib Overall (782)HBV (241, 31%)HCV (214, 27%)Non-viral (327, 42%) 0.78 (0.65–0.93)0.64 (0.48–0.86)1.06 (0.76–1.49)0.74 (0.57–0.95) 0.90 (0.77–1.05)---
Durvalumab vs. sorafenib Overall (778)HBV (238, 31%)HCV (211, 27%)Non-viral (329, 42%) 0.86 (0.73–1.03)0.78 (0.58–1.04)1.05 (0.75–1.48)0.82 (0.64–1.05) 1.02 (0.88–1.19)---
 CheckMate 459 [121] Nivolumab vs. sorafenib Overall (743)HBV (233, 31%)HCV (173, 23%)Non-viral (336, 45%) 0.85 (0.72–1.02)0.77 (0.56–1.05)0.71 (0.49–1.01)0.95 (0.74–1.22) 0.93 (0.79–1.10)---
 RATIONALE-301 [122] Tislelizumab vs. sorafenib Overall (674)HBV (427, 63%)HCV (85, 13%)Non-viral (162, 24%) 0.85 (0.71–1.02)0.91 (0.73–1.14)0.64 (0.38–1.08)0.78 (0.55–1.12) 1.11 (0.92–1.33)---
 LEAP-002 [123] Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib vs. lenvatinib Overall (794)HBV (385, 47%)HCV (181, 22%)Alcohol (251, 31%) 0.84 (0.71–1.00)0.75 (0.58–0.97)0.86 (0.60–1.24)0.84 (0.67–1.05) 0.83 (0.71–0.98)---
 CARES-310 [124] Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib vs. sorafenib Overall (543)HBV (405, 75%)HCV (51, 9%)Non-viral (87, 16%) 0.62 (0.49–0.80)0.66 (0.50–0.87)0.45 (0.18–1.16)0.71 (0.37–1.36) 0.52 (0.41–0.65)0.57 (0.45–0.72)0.46 (0.21–1.05)0.55 (0.33–0.93)
 ORIENT-32 [125] Sintilimab plus IBI305 vs. sorafenib Overall (571)HBV (538, 94%)Non-HBV (33, 6%) 0.57 (0.43–0.75)0.58 (0.43–0.76)0.80 (0.22–2.87) 0.56 (0.46–0.70)0.56 (0.40–0.76)0.38 (0.14–1.06)
Immunotherapy: second line
 KEYNOTE-240 [126] Pembrolizumab vs. placebo Overall (413)HBV (101, 24%)HCV (64, 15%)Non-viral (248, 60%) 0.78 (0.61–1.00)0.57 (0.35–0.94)0.96 (0.48–1.92)0.88 (0.64–1.20) 0.72 (0.57–0.90)0.70 (0.44–1.13)0.46 (0.24–0.90)0.75 (0.56–1.01)
 KEYNOTE-394 [127] Pembrolizumab vs. placebo Overall (453)HBV (360, 79%)Non-HBV (93, 21%) 0.79 (0.63–0.99)0.78 (0.61–0.99)0.87 (0.53–1.44) 0.74 (0.60–0.92)0.77 (0.61–0.98)0.58 (0.36–0.94)
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: first line
 SHARP [128,129] Sorafenib vs. placebo Overall (439)HBV (111, 18%)HCV (169, 28%)Alcohol (159, 26%) 0.69 (0.55–0.87)0.76 (0.38–1.50)0.50 (0.32–0.77)0.76 (0.50–1.16) ----
 Asia–Pacific [130,131] Sorafenib vs. placebo Overall (226)HBV (165, 73%)Non-HBV (61, 27%) 0.68 (0.50–0.93)0.74 (0.51–1.06)0.57 (0.29–1.13) ---
 REFLECT [132] Lenvatinib vs. sorafenib Overall (753)HBV (479, 50%)HCV (217, 23%)Alcohol (57, 6%) 0.92 (0.79–1.06)0.83 (0.68–1.02)0.91 (0.66–1.26)1.03 (0.47–2.28) 0.66 (0.57–0.77)0.62 (0.50–0.75)0.78 (0.56–1.09)0.27 (0.11–0.66)
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: second line
 CELESTIAL [133] Cabozantinib vs. placebo Overall (707)HBV (267, 38%)HCV (168, 24%)Non-viral (272, 38%) 0.76 (0.63–0.92)0.69 (0.51–0.94)1.11 (0.72–1.71)0.72 (0.54–0.96) 0.44 (0.36–0.52)0.31 (0.23–0.42)0.61 (0.42–0.88)0.48 (0.36–0.63)
 RESORCE [134] Regorafenib vs. placebo Overall (573)HBV (216, 38%)HCV (119, 21%)Alcohol (145, 25%) 0.63 (0.50–0.79)0.58 (0.41–0.82)0.79 (0.49–1.26)0.92 (0.61–1.38) 0.46 (0.37–0.56)0.39 (0.29–0.54)0.59 (0.39–0.90)0.53 (0.37–0.77)
 REACH-2 [135] Ramucirumab vs. placebo Overall (292)HBV (107, 37%)HCV (76, 26%)Other (109, 37%) 0.71 (0.53–0.95)0.84 (0.52–1.35)0.76 (0.44–1.33)0.63 (0.38–1.06) 0.45 (0.34–0·60)0.43 (0.28–0.68)0.33 (0.19–0.60)0.57 (0.35–0.95)
HR, hazard ratio.