Review

Influenza disease burden and the need for highly immunogenic vaccines in older adults: a narrative review

Joon Young Song 1 , 2 , * https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0148-7194
Author Information & Copyright
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2Vaccine Innovation Center-KU Medicine (VIC-K), Seoul, Korea
*Corresponding author: Joon Young Song, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Gurodong-ro 148, Guro-gu, Seoul 08308, Korea, E-mail: infection@korea.ac.kr

© Copyright 2024 Ewha Womans University College of Medicine and Ewha Medical Research Institute. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 18, 2024; Revised: Jul 06, 2024; Accepted: Jul 08, 2024

Published Online: Jul 31, 2024

Abstract

Influenza presents a considerable disease burden, particularly among adults over 65 years old. In this population, the disease is associated with high rates of infection, hospitalization, and mortality. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of influenza on older adults and to evaluate the effectiveness of influenza vaccines within this demographic. A literature search was conducted using PubMed to identify relevant English-language studies published from January 2000 to January 2024. The analysis indicated that influenza-related hospitalization rates (ranging from 10.1 to 308.3 per 100,000 persons) and all-cause excess mortality rates (1.1 to 228.2 per 100,000 persons) were notably high in older adults, although these rates varied over time and by location. Hospitalization rates due to influenza increased considerably after the age of 50 years, with the highest rates observed in individuals aged 85 years and older. Excess mortality attributable to influenza also rose with age, with rates between 17.9 and 223.5 per 100,000 persons in those over 75 years old. The effectiveness of influenza vaccines in preventing severe infections requiring hospitalization was found to be only 37% in individuals aged 65 years and older. The unadjuvanted, standard-dose influenza vaccine had an estimated effectiveness of just 25% against laboratory-confirmed influenza and between 37% and 43.7% in preventing hospitalizations. Therefore, considering the substantial burden of influenza and the limited efficacy of standard vaccines, the use of highly immunogenic influenza vaccines should be prioritized for older adults.

Keywords: Aged; Hospitalization; Influenza vaccines; Morbidity; Vaccine efficacy

Introduction

Influenza accounts for the highest disease burden in terms of infection, hospitalizations, and mortality rates among acute infectious diseases, leading to high medical expenses and socioeconomic losses [13]. Each year, epidemics affect more than 5% to 10% of the global population, with the extent of impact varying based on the antigenic match of circulating strains and vaccination coverage during the season [4]. A community-based prospective cohort study from Korea reported an overall influenza incidence rate of approximately 7 per 100 persons over three seasons from 2012 to 2015 [5]. The number of hospitalizations and deaths from pneumonia and other complications surges following an influenza epidemic, particularly affecting children under 5 years of age and adults over 65 years. Most deaths occur in the latter population. Due to the consistently high impact of the disease on older adults, a thorough review of the influenza disease burden and the effectiveness of vaccines is crucial.

The objective of this narrative literature review was to evaluate the disease burden of influenza, with a focus on its impact on older adults in terms of infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates. Furthermore, this study aims to assess the effectiveness of influenza vaccines in older adults across different seasons, thereby providing insights that may improve vaccination strategies.

Ethics statement

It is a literature database-based review; therefore, neither approval by the institutional review board nor obtainment of informed consent was required.

Methods

In this narrative literature review, we first conducted a search on PubMed for relevant English-language articles, published between January 2000 and January 2024. We employed the snowballing search method throughout the review process. The key search terms included “influenza,” “influenza-like illness,” “older adults,” “disease burden,” “hospitalization,” “excess mortality,” efficacy,” and “vaccine effectiveness,” which were tailored to each topic. After reviewing titles, abstracts, and full manuscripts, we selected relevant studies for inclusion in this review. Furthermore, we manually searched the references cited in the chosen articles to identify additional sources pertinent to this review.

Results

Influenza-related hospitalizations in older adults

Influenza virus infections are more common among socially active young adults; however, hospitalizations due to pneumonia and severe infections predominantly affect older individuals, although rates vary across studies. Comparing influenza-related hospitalization rates between countries is challenging due to differences in the medical environment, including hospital accessibility and admission criteria. A population-based study in the United States estimated age-specific influenza-associated hospitalization rates for respiratory failure (Table 1) [6]. The overall rate was 2.7 per 100,000 person-years, with an increasing trend observed after the age of 50 years: 0.8 for ages 18–49; 4.0 for ages 50–64; 8.7 for ages 65–74; 16.5 for ages 75–84; and 27.9 for those aged 85 and older. In a 15-year study (1998–2012) in Hong Kong, an average of 32.7 per 10,000 persons were hospitalized annually for respiratory viral infections, most commonly due to influenza A (183 per 100,000 persons), respiratory syncytial virus (57 per 100,000 persons), and influenza B (35 per 100,000 persons). Hospitalizations were particularly common among adults aged 65 years and over, with rates two to three times higher than among those 50–64 years old [7]. In France, over eight epidemic seasons from 2010/2011 to 2017/2018, the estimated influenza-associated excess hospitalization rates ranged from 11.6 to 61.9 per 100,000 persons for influenza and pneumonia and from 20.4 to 75.3 per 100,000 persons for respiratory causes across all ages. For adults aged 65 years and over, the rates were 10.1 to 202.6 per 100,000 persons for influenza and pneumonia and 26.3 to 308.3 per 100,000 persons for respiratory causes [8]. A Korean study utilizing a nationwide healthcare database (associated with the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service) over the decade from 2009 to 2019 found that the influenza-related hospitalization rate decreased following the 2009 H1N1 pandemic but increased during the 2013/2014 season, peaking at 169.9 per 100,000 people in 2017/2018 [9].

Table 1. Estimated rates of influenza-related hospitalization
Study [reference] Years Country Category of admission Annual rates of influenza-related hospitalization (per 100,000 persons)
Ortiz et al. [6] 2003–2009 United States Respiratory failure Overall: 2.7
18–49 years: 0.8
50–64 years: 4.0
65–74 years: 8.7
75–84 years: 16.5
≥85 years: 27.9
Chan et al. [7] 1998–2012 Hong Kong Influenza A ≥65 years: 183
Influenza B ≥65 years: 35
Lemaitre et al. [8] 2010–2018 France Pneumonia and influenza Overall: 11.6–61.9
≥65 years: 10.1–202.6
Respiratory Overall: 20.4–75.3
≥65 years: 26.3–308.3
Hong et al. [9] 2009–2019 Korea Influenza 20.5–169.9
Download Excel Table
Influenza-attributable excess mortality among older adults

Using time series log-linear regression models based on vital death records and influenza surveillance data, global seasonal influenza-associated respiratory excess mortality rates were estimated for 33 countries. The results revealed an increase in this rate with age. Influenza-associated excess mortality rates ranged from 0.1 to 6.4 per 100,000 persons under 65 years, 2.9 to 44.0 per 100,000 persons between 65 and 74 years, and 17.9 to 223.5 per 100,000 persons over 75 years (Table 2) [10]. These rates varied over time and by location, influenced by factors such as age distribution, prevalence of chronic diseases, dominant influenza subtype, population density, and climate.

Table 2. Estimated excess mortality attributable to influenza
Study [reference] Years Countries Category of death Annual excess mortality rates (per 100,000 persons)
Iuliano et al. [10] 1999–2015 33 Countries Respiratory <65 years: 0.1–6.4
65–74 years: 2.9–44.0
≥75 years: 17.9–223.5
Schmidt et al. [11] 2015–2017 Denmark All-cause Overall: 20.3–24.0
Spain Overall: 22.9–52.9
United States Overall: 4.7–14.3
Nielsen et al. [12] 1994–2010 Denmark All-cause Overall: 35 (range, 6–100)
Nunes et al. [13] 1980–2004 Portugal All-cause Overall: 24.7
Giacchetta et al. [15] 1970–2001 Italy All-cause Overall: 11.6–18.6
≥65 years: 91.1
Pneumonia and influenza Overall: 1.9–2.2
≥65 years: 13.3
Lemaitre et al. [8] 2010–2015 France All-cause Overall: 0.3–26.6
≥65 years: 1.1–151.3
Pneumonia and influenza Overall: 0.1–4.3
≥65 years: 2.1–24.5
Cardiovascular Overall: 0.3–7.6
≥65 years: 0.8–42.8
Li et al. [16] 1990–2018 China All-cause Overall: 49.6–228.2
Pneumonia and influenza Overall: 0.7–30.4
Respiratory/circulatory Overall: 30.8–170.2
Jang et al. [18] 2013–2017 Korea All-cause Overall: 49.5
Hong et al. [19] 2009–2016 Korea All-cause Overall: 10.6
≥65 years: 74.1
Ohmi et al. [20] 1970–1980s Japan All-cause ≥65 years: 6.2
1990s ≥65 years: 9.4
2000s ≥65 years: 2.0
Download Excel Table

A study comparing the 2015/2016 and 2016/2017 influenza seasons across multiple countries indicated that the all-cause excess mortality rates were 4.7 and 14.3 per 100,000 persons in the United States, 20.3 and 24.0 per 100,000 persons in Denmark, and 22.9 and 52.9 per 100,000 persons in Spain, respectively [11]. The estimates for excess mortality due to respiratory and circulatory causes were two to three times lower than those for all causes. Another study in Denmark, spanning from 1994/1995 to 2009/2010, reported a median all-cause excess mortality rate of 35 (range, 6–100) per 100,000 persons; 88% of these deaths were among older adults aged 65 years and above, with higher mortality observed during seasons dominated by the A/H3N2 subtype [12]. In Portugal, from 1980 to 2004, the estimated all-cause excess mortality rate was 24.7 per 100,000 persons, with approximately 90% of these deaths occurring in seniors over 65 years old [13]. Excess mortality rates were three to six times higher during A/H3N2 subtype-dominant seasons compared to those dominated by A/H1N1 or B viruses. Due to more rapid mutations and antigenic drifts, A/H3N2 viruses likely pose a greater disease burden—including higher hospitalization and mortality rates—than A/H1N1 and B viruses [14]. In Italy, three studies assessed nationwide excess deaths attributable to influenza between 1970 and 2001 [15]. The findings indicated influenza-related mortality rates of 1.9 to 2.2 per 100,000 persons for pneumonia and influenza, while the all-cause rates were 11.6 to 18.6 per 100,000 persons. Among older adults, the age-adjusted excess death rates were 13.3 per 100,000 persons for pneumonia and influenza and 91.1 per 100,000 persons for all causes. In France, between the 2010/2011 and 2014/2015 seasons, the all-cause influenza-associated excess mortality rates ranged from 0.3 to 26.6 per 100,000 persons for all ages and from 1.1 to 151.3 per 100,000 persons for older adults aged 65 years and above [8].

Several Asian countries have reported comparatively high excess mortality rates, with significant variations by country and season. A systematic review of 17 Chinese studies found that influenza-related excess mortality rates for all causes, respiratory and circulatory diseases, and pneumonia/influenza varied widely, with rates of 49.6–228.2, 30.8–170.2, and 0.7–30.4 per 100,000 persons, respectively [16]. Furthermore, Li et al. estimated the average annual influenza-associated excess mortality rates by age group, revealing rates of 0.9, 66.1, and 519.6 per 100,000 persons for the age groups of 0–59 years, 60–79 years, and ≥80 years, respectively, between 2015 and 2018 [17]. In Korea, a nationwide matched cohort study indicated an influenza-associated excess mortality rate of 49.5 per 100,000 persons, with the highest rate observed in older adults aged ≥65 years [18]. Another Korean study, which combined weekly mortality data from Statistics Korea with laboratory surveillance data from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency from 2009 to 2016, estimated the all-cause excess mortality rate at 10.6 per 100,000 persons for all ages and 74.1 per 100,000 persons for older adults [19]. In Japan, age-adjusted average excess mortality rates were relatively low, averaging 6.2 per 100,000 persons during the 1970s and 1980s when vaccination of school-aged children was mandatory [20]. This rate increased to 9.4 per 100,000 persons in the 1990s upon discontinuation of the childhood vaccination program, then decreased to 2.0 when influenza vaccination was administered to older adults in the 2000s.

Low influenza vaccine effectiveness among older adults

Vaccination is recognized as 50% to 80% effective in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza among young adults [21]. However, a recent meta-analysis revealed that the overall effectiveness of the influenza vaccine among older adults was only 25%, with no statistically significant protection against influenza A/H3N2 in the Northern Hemisphere [22]. Additionally, the analysis indicated that pooled vaccine effectiveness diminished with increasing age in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres.

Most influenza-related hospitalizations and deaths occur among older adults. Thus, the primary objective of influenza vaccination in this population is to reduce the number of hospitalizations and deaths resulting from severe infections. However, one meta-analysis indicated that the effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing influenza-related hospitalization is only 43.7% (95% CI, 39.7%–47.4%) [23]. Another meta-analysis, which stratified participants by age, indicated that the influenza vaccine was 41% (95% CI, 34%–48%) effective in preventing severe infections that required hospitalization among individuals aged 18–64 years and 37% (95% CI, 30%–44%) effective among those aged 65 years and older [24].

Recent studies have assessed the effectiveness of influenza vaccines in preventing severe outcomes, such as organ failure and death. A study from the United States conducted during the 2022–2023 season found the effectiveness of vaccination against hospitalization due to type A influenza was 37% (95% CI, 27%–46%). This effectiveness varied by age group (18–64 years: 47% [95% CI, 30%–60%]; ≥65 years: 28% [95% CI, 10%–43%]) and by virus subtype (A/H3N2: 29% [95% CI, 6%–46%]; A/H1N1: 47% [95% CI, 23%–64%]) [25]. Additionally, the influenza vaccine was 65% (95% CI, 56%–72%) effective against influenza-related organ failure (involving the respiratory, cardiovascular, or renal systems) and 48% (95% CI, −70% to 84%) effective against death. In a separate study from Norway covering the same season, the effectiveness of vaccination against influenza-associated hospitalization was 34% (95% CI, 26%–42%) for adults aged 65–79 years and 40% (95% CI, 30%–48%) for individuals aged ≥80 years. The effectiveness against influenza-associated death was 6.6% (95% CI, −64% to 47%) for the 65–79 age group and 37% (95% CI, 0.5%–61%) for those aged ≥80 years [26]. While the influenza vaccine does reduce the risk of severe disease, its effectiveness is considerably lower than that of the vaccines for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For preventing COVID-19–associated hospitalization, the effectiveness of vaccination was 65% (95% CI, 61%–69%) among adults aged 65–79 years and 55% (95% CI, 49%–60%) among those aged ≥80 years [26]. Regarding COVID-19–associated death, the effectiveness was 68% (95% CI, 48%–80%) for the 65–79 age group and 78% (95% CI, 65%–86%) for those aged ≥80 years.

Discussion

Given the high rates of hospitalization and death among older adults, reducing the disease burden of influenza through vaccination is essential. In Korea, the vaccination rate for seniors aged 65 years and older has been maintained at over 80% [27]. However, the antibody titer produced in older adult populations following influenza vaccination is approximately 40% to 80% of that in healthy adults, indicating relatively low vaccine effectiveness, ranging from 31% to 58% [28,29].

Influenza vaccines are currently approved based on a hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titer of ≥40 for young adults under 60 years old and ≥30 for seniors over 60 years. However, an HI titer of 1:30 or 1:40 only represents the antibody level that can prevent 50% of influenza virus infections in healthy adults [30]. To achieve vaccine effectiveness greater than 90%, an HI titer exceeding 1:100 may be necessary; however, it is challenging to attain such high immunogenicity among older adults with available conventional vaccines [30]. Furthermore, since seasonal influenza epidemics can persist for more than 6 months, maintaining adequate protective immunity over this duration is crucial. However, HI titers typically start to wane after vaccination and decline sharply after 6 months [31]. The lower vaccine effectiveness observed in older adults aged 65 years and older may also stem from the short duration of vaccine-induced immunity and immune imprinting from repeated exposure, particularly to influenza A/H3N2. Consequently, a need exists for influenza vaccines that are highly immunogenic, induce long-lasting immunity, and minimize immune imprinting. To increase the efficacy of influenza vaccines in older adults, high-dose (Fluzone High-Dose, 60 μg hemagglutinin [HA]/strain), MF59-adjuvanted (Fluad, 15 μg HA/strain), and intradermal (Fluzone Intradermal, 15 μg HA/strain) vaccines have been developed [32-34]. Compared to the conventional standard-dose vaccine, these options have demonstrated higher immunogenicity in terms of their relative HI titer ratios [35]. Although intradermal vaccines are no longer produced, both MF59-adjuvanted and high-dose vaccines have been introduced and are currently available for use.

When evaluating the relative vaccine effectiveness of the MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine compared to the unadjuvanted standard-dose vaccine over three consecutive influenza seasons (2017–2018, 2018–2019, and 2019–2020) in the United States, the MF59-adjuvanted, trivalent vaccine displayed superior effectiveness over the quadrivalent alternative. The MF59-adjuvanted option displayed better prevention of influenza-related medical visits, with relative effectiveness estimates ranging from 20.8% (95% CI, 18.4%–23.2%) to 27.5% (95% CI, 24.4%–30.5%) [36]. Additionally, the MF59-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine further reduced influenza-related hospitalizations, demonstrating a relative vaccine effectiveness of 6.5% (95% CI, 0.1%–12.4%). In a meta-analysis comparing the relative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose, unadjuvanted influenza vaccines, the high-dose option displayed superior protection against influenza-like illness compared to the standard-dose vaccine, with a relative effectiveness of 15.9% (95% CI, 4.1%–26.3%) [37]. Moreover, the high-dose vaccine was more effective in preventing hospital admissions, with significant relative effectiveness against all causes (8.4%; 95% CI, 5.7%–11.0%), pneumonia/influenza (13.4%; 95% CI, 7.3%–19.2%), and cardiorespiratory events (17.9%; 95% CI, 15.0%–20.8%). When the relative effectiveness of the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine was compared to the high-dose vaccine in a meta-analysis that excluded studies sponsored by pharmaceutical companies, no significant difference was found in the prevention of influenza-related emergency room visits, hospitalizations, or pneumonia between the two vaccines [29].

Antigenic mismatches between newly developed vaccines and circulating strains can meaningfully reduce vaccine efficacy. In a randomized study, the MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine demonstrated greater cross-reactivity against antigenically drifted, heterovariant A/H3N2 strains compared to the unadjuvanted standard-dose influenza vaccine [14]. Further research is required to ascertain whether the MF59-adjuvanted or the high-dose influenza vaccine is more advantageous in terms of immunological outcomes, including cross-reactive immunity to variant viruses and the capacity to overcome immune imprinting.

In conclusion, influenza imposes a considerable disease burden on older adults, characterized by high rates of infection, hospitalization, and mortality. The effectiveness of influenza vaccines in this demographic fluctuates by season but is substantially lower than that observed in younger adults. Even with high vaccination rates among older adults, the suboptimal effectiveness underscores the need for improved vaccination strategies. These include the use of high-dose and adjuvanted vaccines to increase immunogenicity and afford more robust protection against influenza in this vulnerable age group.

Authors' contributions

All work was done by Joon Young Song.

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

Not applicable.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Supplementary materials

Not applicable.

References

1.

Yang TU, Song JY, Noh JY, Cheong HJ, Kim WJ. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccine coverage rates among patients admitted to a teaching hospital in South Korea. Infect Chemother 2015; 47(1):41-48

2.

Cassini A, Colzani E, Pini A, Mangen MJJ, Plass D, McDonald SA, et al. Impact of infectious diseases on population health using incidence-based disability-adjusted life years (DALYs): results from the Burden of Communicable Diseases in Europe study, European Union and European Economic Area countries, 2009 to 2013. Eur Surveill 2018; 23(16):17-00454

3.

Kang SH, Cheong HJ, Song JY, Noh JY, Jeon JH, Choi MJ, et al. Analysis of risk factors for severe acute respiratory infection and pneumonia and among adult patients with acute respiratory illness during 2011-2014 influenza seasons in Korea. Infect Chemother 2016; 48(4):294-301

4.

Fischer WA, Gong M, Bhagwanjee S, Sevransky J. Global burden of influenza as a cause of cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality. Glob Heart 2014; 9(3):325-336

5.

Chun BC. Epidemiology and surveillance of influenza.In In: Kim WJ, editor.editor Influenza. Seoul: Transgovernmental Enterprise for Pandemic Influenza in Korea (TEPIK). 2016.

6.

Ortiz JR, Neuzil KM, Rue TC, Zhou H, Shay DK, Cheng PY, et al. Population-based incidence estimates of influenza-associated respiratory failure hospitalizations, 2003 to 2009. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188(6):710-715

7.

Chan PKS, Tam WWS, Lee TC, Hon KL, Lee N, Chan MCW, et al. Hospitalization incidence, mortality, and seasonality of common respiratory viruses over a period of 15 years in a developed subtropical city. Medicine 2015; 94(46):e2024

8.

Lemaitre M, Fouad F, Carrat F, Crépey P, Gaillat J, Gavazzi G, et al. Estimating the burden of influenza-related and associated hospitalizations and deaths in France: an eight-season data study, 2010–2018. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2022; 16(4):717-725

9.

Hong TH, Lee HS, Kim NE, Lee KJ, Kim YK, An JN, et al. Recent increases in influenza-related hospitalizations, critical care resource use, and in-hospital mortality: a 10-year population-based study in South Korea. J Clin Med 2022; 11(16):4911

10.

Iuliano AD, Roguski KM, Chang HH, Muscatello DJ, Palekar R, Tempia S, et al. Estimates of global seasonal influenza-associated respiratory mortality: a modelling study. Lancet 2018; 391(10127):1285-1300

11.

Schmidt SSS, Iuliano AD, Vestergaard LS, Mazagatos-Ateca C, Larrauri A, Brauner JM, et al. All-cause versus cause-specific excess deaths for estimating influenza-associated mortality in Denmark, Spain, and the United States. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2022; 16(4):707-716

12.

Nielsen J, Mazick A, Glismann S, Mølbak K. Excess mortality related to seasonal influenza and extreme temperatures in Denmark, 1994-2010. BMC Infect Dis 2011; 11:350

13.

Nunes B, Viboud C, Machado A, Ringholz C, Rebelo-de-Andrade H, Nogueira P, et al. Excess mortality associated with influenza epidemics in Portugal, 1980 to 2004. PLoS One 2011; 6(6):e20661

14.

Tsai TF. Fluad®-MF59®-adjuvanted influenza vaccine in older adults. Infect Chemother 2013; 45(2):159-174

15.

Giacchetta I, Primieri C, Cavalieri R, Domnich A, de Waure C. The burden of seasonal influenza in Italy: a systematic review of influenza-related complications, hospitalizations, and mortality. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2021; 16(2):351-365

16.

Li S, Liu SS, Zhu AQ, Cui JZ, Qin Y, Zheng JD, et al. The mortality burden of influenza in China: a systematic review. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2019; 53(10):1049-1055

17.

Li L, Yan ZL, Luo L, Liu W, Yang Z, Shi C, et al. Influenza-associated excess mortality by age, sex, and subtype/lineage: population-based time-series study with a distributed-lag nonlinear model. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023; 9:e42530

18.

Jang H, Cho J, Cho SK, Lee D, Cho S, Koh SB, et al. All-cause and cause-specific mortality attributable to seasonal influenza: a nationwide matched cohort study. J Korean Med Sci 2023; 38(25):e188

19.

Hong K, Sohn S, Chun BC. Estimating influenza-associated mortality in Korea: the 2009-2016 seasons. J Prev Med Public Health 2019; 52(5):308-315

20.

Ohmi K, Marui E. Estimation of the excess death associated with influenza pandemics and epidemics in Japan after world war II: relation with pandemics and the vaccination system. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi 2011; 58(10):867-878.

21.

Nichol KL. Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccination. Vaccine 2008; 26(Suppl 4):D17-D22

22.

Okoli GN, Racovitan F, Abdulwahid T, Righolt CH, Mahmud SM. Variable seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness across geographical regions, age groups and levels of vaccine antigenic similarity with circulating virus strains: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence from test-negative design studies after the 2009/10 influenza pandemic. Vaccine 2021; 39(8):1225-1240

23.

Guo J, Chen X, Guo Y, Liu M, Li P, Tao Y, et al. Real-world effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination and age as effect modifier: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of test-negative design studies. Vaccine 2024; 42(8):1883-1891

24.

Rondy M, El Omeiri N, Thompson MG, Levêque A, Moren A, Sullivan SG. Effectiveness of influenza vaccines in preventing severe influenza illness among adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design case-control studies. J Infect 2017; 75(5):381-394

25.

Lewis NM, Zhu Y, Peltan ID, Gaglani M, McNeal T, Ghamande S, et al. Vaccine effectiveness against influenza A–associated hospitalization, organ failure, and death: United States, 2022–2023. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 78(4):1056-1064

26.

Seppälä E, Dahl J, Veneti L, Rydland KM, Klüwer B, Rohringer A, et al. COVID-19 and influenza vaccine effectiveness against associated hospital admission and death among individuals over 65 years in Norway: a population-based cohort study, 3 October 2022 to 20 June 2023. Vaccine 2024; 42(3):620-628

27.

Yun JW, Noh JY, Song JY, Chun C, Kim Y, Cheong HJ. The Korean influenza national immunization program: history and present status. Infect Chemother 2017; 49(4):247-254

28.

Seidman JC, Richard SA, Viboud C, Miller MA. Quantitative review of antibody response to inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2011; 6(1):52-62

29.

Domnich A, de Waure C. Comparative effectiveness of adjuvanted versus high-dose seasonal influenza vaccines for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis 2022; 122:855-863

30.

Coudeville L, Bailleux F, Riche B, Megas F, Andre P, Ecochard R. Relationship between haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody titres and clinical protection against influenza: development and application of a Bayesian random-effects model. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10:18

31.

Song JY, Cheong HJ, Hwang IS, Choi WS, Jo YM, Park DW, et al. Long-term immunogenicity of influenza vaccine among the elderly: risk factors for poor immune response and persistence. Vaccine 2010; 28(23):3929-3935

32.

Noh JY, Kim WJ. Influenza vaccines: unmet needs and recent developments. Infect Chemother 2013; 45(4):375-386

33.

Choi WS, Song JY, Kwon KT, Lee HJ, Choo EJ, Baek J, et al. Recommendations for adult immunization by the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases, 2023: minor revisions to the 3rd edition. Infect Chemother 2024; 56(2):188-203

34.

Choi WS. Adult immunization policy in Korea. Infect Chemother 2023; 55(3):317-321

35.

Ng TWY, Cowling BJ, Gao HZ, Thompson MG. Comparative immunogenicity of enhanced seasonal influenza vaccines in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Dis 2019; 219(10):1525-1535

36.

Boikos C, McGovern I, Ortiz JR, Puig-Barberà J, Versage E, Haag M. Relative vaccine effectiveness of adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine over three consecutive influenza seasons in the United States. Vaccines 2022; 10(9):1456

37.

Lee JKH, Lam GKL, Shin T, Samson SI, Greenberg DP, Chit A. Efficacy and effectiveness of high-dose influenza vaccine in older adults by circulating strain and antigenic match: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine 2021; 39(Suppl 1):A24-A35