• Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
JOURNAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Page Path

Original Article

Effect of Injection Speed of Local Anesthetic on Hypotension during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section

The Ewha Medical Journal 2012;35(2):83-88. Published online: September 30, 2012

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author: Yong In Kang, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, 566 Nonhyeon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-913, Korea. Tel: 82-2-3468-3080, Fax: 82-2-558-1119, anein09@hanmail.net
• Received: June 5, 2012   • Accepted: July 2, 2012

Copyright © 2012. Ewha Womans University School of Medicine

  • 29 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
  • Objectives
    Maternal hypotension is a common problem during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. We evaluated the influence of injection speed of local anesthetic to subarachnoid space on maternal hypotension and level of sensory block.
  • Methods
    Bupivacaine (0.5%) 9 mg with fentanyl 10 µg was injected to subarachnoid space either quickly (during 20 seconds, 0.1 mL/sec, n=20) or slowly (during 100 seconds, 0.02 mL/sec, n=20) in parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section. The onset and level of sensory block was checked and heart rate and blood pressure was checked by 2.5 minutes during 20 minutes. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg or <70% of baseline) was treated with ephedrine.
  • Results
    Hypotension occurred 70% of parturients with spinal anesthesia. Slow injection didn't influence on the onset and level of sensory block and didn't reduce the incidence of hypotension. But onset of hypotension was delayed.
  • Conclusion
    Slow injection (during 100 seconds, 0.02 mL/sec) of local anesthetic delayed onset of hypotension and required less amount of ephedrine. Slow injection of local anesthetic was one of the effective methods for the cardiovascular stability during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
  • 1. The Korean Society of AnesthesiologistsAnesthesia 2002;Seoul, Koonja Inc..
  • 2. Simon L, Boulay G, Ziane AF, Noblesse E, Mathiot JL, Toubas MF, et al. Effect of injection rate on hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2000;9:10-14.
  • 3. Ebner H, Barcohana J, Bartoshuk AK. Influence of postspinal hypotension on the fetal electrocardiogram. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1960;80:569-572.
  • 4. Corke BC, Datta S, Ostheimer GW, Weiss JB, Alper MH. Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section: the influence of hypotension on neonatal outcome. Anaesthesia 1982;37:658-662.
  • 5. Miller RD. Miller's anesthesia 2005;6th ed. San Francisco, Elsevier Inc..
  • 6. Bucx MJ, Kroon JW, Stienstra R. Effect of speed of injection on the maximum sensory level for spinal anesthesia using plain bupivacaine 0.5% at room temperature. Reg Anesth 1993;18:103-105.
  • 7. Stienstra R, Gielen M, Kroon JW, Van Poorten F. The influence of temperature and speed of injection on the distribution of a solution containing bupivacaine and methylene blue in a spinal canal model. Reg Anesth 1990;15:6-11.
  • 8. Van Gessel EF, Praplan J, Fuchs T, Forster A, Gamulin Z. Influence of injection speed on the subarachnoid distribution of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5%. Anesth Analg 1993;77:483-487.
  • 9. Prakash S, Bhartiya V, Pramanik V, Pahilajani J, Gogia AR, Singh R. The effect of injection speed on the spinal block characteristics of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in the elderly. J Anesth 2010;24:877-881.
  • 10. Atchison SR, Wedel DJ, Wilson PR. Effect of injection rate on level and duration of hypobaric spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1989;69:496-500.
  • 11. Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Wilson PR. Effect of injection rate on sensory level and duration of hypobaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty. Anesth Analg 1994;79:773-777.
  • 12. Holman SJ, Robinson RA, Beardsley D, Stewart SF, Klein L, Stevens RA. Hyperbaric dye solution distribution characteristics after pencil-point needle injection in a spinal cord model. Anesthesiology 1997;86:966-973.
  • 13. Bourke DL, Sprung J, Harrison C, Thomas P. High injection speed overwhelms other maneuvers for controlling the spread of spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1995;81:427-428.
  • 14. Tuominen M, Pitkänen M, Rosenberg PH. Effect of speed of injection of 0.5% plain bupivacaine on the spread of spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1992;69:148-149.
  • 15. Davis H, King WR. Densities of cerebrospinal fluid of human beings. Anesthesiology 1954;15:666-672.
  • 16. Brown DT, Wildsmith JA, Covino BG, Scott DB. Effect of baricity on spinal anaesthesia with amethocaine. Br J Anaesth 1980;52:589-596.
  • 17. Greene NM. Distribution of local anesthetic solutions within the subarachnoid space. Anesth Analg 1985;64:715-730.
  • 18. Neigh JL, Kane PB, Smith TC. Effects of speed and direction of injection on the level and duration of spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1970;49:912-918.
  • 19. The Korean Society of Obstetric AnesthesiologistsObstetric anesthesia 2009;Seoul, Koonja Inc..
  • 20. Cho HS, Son YS, Chung KD, Lee WH, Park JM, Chung JH, et al. The effect of injection speed of local anesthetic on success rate of unilateral spinal anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol 2005;49:793-797.
  • 21. Bouchnak M, Belhadj N, Chaaoua T, Azaiez W, Hamdi M, Maghrebi H. Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section: dose injection speed have an effect on the incidence of hypotension? Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2006;25:17-19.
Table 1
Patient characteristics

There are no significant differences between two groups. The values are presented as mean±SD.

emj-35-83-i001.jpg
Table 2
Data between two groups

There are no significant differences between two groups. Values are presented as mean±SD.

emj-35-83-i002.jpg
Table 3
Ephedrine data

There are significant difference between two groups in the first ephedrine injection time but no differences in the number of use and amount of ephedrine. Values are presented as mean±SD. *P<0.05 between two groups.

emj-35-83-i003.jpg
Table 4
Hemodynamic data in two groups

There are no significant differences between two groups in SBP, DBP and HR. Values are presented as mean±SD. SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HR, heart rate.

emj-35-83-i004.jpg

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Download Citation

      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:

      Include:

      Effect of Injection Speed of Local Anesthetic on Hypotension during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section
      Ewha Med J. 2012;35(2):83-88.   Published online September 30, 2012
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Effect of Injection Speed of Local Anesthetic on Hypotension during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section
      Ewha Med J. 2012;35(2):83-88.   Published online September 30, 2012
      Close
      Effect of Injection Speed of Local Anesthetic on Hypotension during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section
      Effect of Injection Speed of Local Anesthetic on Hypotension during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section

      Patient characteristics

      There are no significant differences between two groups. The values are presented as mean±SD.

      Data between two groups

      There are no significant differences between two groups. Values are presented as mean±SD.

      Ephedrine data

      There are significant difference between two groups in the first ephedrine injection time but no differences in the number of use and amount of ephedrine. Values are presented as mean±SD. *P<0.05 between two groups.

      Hemodynamic data in two groups

      There are no significant differences between two groups in SBP, DBP and HR. Values are presented as mean±SD. SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HR, heart rate.

      Table 1 Patient characteristics

      There are no significant differences between two groups. The values are presented as mean±SD.

      Table 2 Data between two groups

      There are no significant differences between two groups. Values are presented as mean±SD.

      Table 3 Ephedrine data

      There are significant difference between two groups in the first ephedrine injection time but no differences in the number of use and amount of ephedrine. Values are presented as mean±SD. *P<0.05 between two groups.

      Table 4 Hemodynamic data in two groups

      There are no significant differences between two groups in SBP, DBP and HR. Values are presented as mean±SD. SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HR, heart rate.

      TOP