• Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
JOURNAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Page Path

Original Article

Effect of the Cellophane Prosthesis to the Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Perforation

The Ewha Medical Journal 1986;9(3):197-205. Published online: July 24, 2015

Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine Ewha Womans University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Chong Nahm Kim. Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Korea.

Copyright © 1986. Ewha Womans University School of Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 24 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
  • The clinico-statistical study was done on 147 cases of traumatic drum perforation who visited the Department of Otolaryngology, Ewha Womans University Hospital from Jan. '81 to Dec.' 85. Following results were obtained: 1) In sex incidence ; female incidence were more than male(ratio of female and male was about 1.3:1). In age distribution ; the highest incidence was in the group of 10's and 20's in male(70%) and in the group of 20's and 30's in female(75.2%). 2) The duration from tympanic membrane perforation to confirmation at E.N.T.O.P.D. was usually within 3 days in about 50%. 3) The main cause of drum perforation was direct trauma(70%). 4) Frequent complaints after trauma were hearing impairment(34.4%) and after ear stuffiness(18.9%) as in order. 5) The perforation was usually seen in the left ear(over 70% in male and female coincidentally). 6) Most frequent site of drum perforation was seen in anterior, central and posterior as in order. 7) Duration of the healing and hearing gaining after prosthesis was seen in 12 days and 9.7 dB in linear perforation, 14 days healing and 12 dB gaining in small perforation, 31 days healing and 12.6 dB gaining in medium sized perforation. In large perforation, the duration of the healing was mostly 55 days and hearing gaining was 17.2 dB after prosthesis.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Download Citation

      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:

      Include:

      Effect of the Cellophane Prosthesis to the Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Perforation
      Ihwa Ŭidae chi. 1986;9(3):197-205.   Published online July 24, 2015
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Effect of the Cellophane Prosthesis to the Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Perforation
      Ihwa Ŭidae chi. 1986;9(3):197-205.   Published online July 24, 2015
      Close
      Effect of the Cellophane Prosthesis to the Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Perforation
      Effect of the Cellophane Prosthesis to the Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Perforation
      TOP