• Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
JOURNAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Page Path

Original Article

A Study on Psychological Ego Defense Mecanisms Differences Among Age Groups

The Ewha Medical Journal 1993;16(2):133-143. Published online: July 24, 2015

Department of Neuropsychiatry, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Korea.

Copyright © 1993. Ewha Womans University School of Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 42 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
prev next
  • In order to analyse differeatial ego defense mechanisms among age groups classified by developmlental stages, the present study evaluated the results of Ewha Defense Mechanism test which had been completed on June, 1990. The number of subjects were 1,323 normal adults and students with 14~70 age range, who were selected by the proportional straitified sampling method based on sex, age, educational level and residence status of 1985 National Population and Residence Statistics Data.
    Results of the present study were as follows :
    1) There was statistically significant differences among age groups on show-off, reaction formation, identification, passive-aggressive, projection, displacement, denial, suppression, anticipation, rationalization, dissociation, sublimation, acting-out, altruism, regression, humor, evasion scales.
    2) The younger age group had higher scores on show-off, reaction formation, identification, passive-aggrssive, projection, displacment, dissociation, sublimation, acting-out, regression scales and more older, more higher on denial, supression, anticipation, rationalization, altruism, evasion scales.
    3) The female subjects got higher scores on show-off identification, projection, displacement, denial, dissociation, somatization, regression and the male subjects presented higher scores on altruism, humor scales. The interation effects of age and sex were not found on any scales.
    4) It was found that the older group did not get high score on mature defense mechanism scales in case of classified by maturity criteria.
    5) On factor 1 scales of acting-out, displacement, somatization, dissociation, projection, passive-aggressive scales, the younger group presented higher score and the older group had higher score on denial, rationalization, supression, anticipication, evasion scales which were attribute to stablity and adjustment by factor analysis interpretation.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Classification and Evaluation of Defense Mechanisms
      Sumin Hong, Jee Hyun Ha
      Psychoanalysis.2020; 31(1): 1.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    A Study on Psychological Ego Defense Mecanisms Differences Among Age Groups
    Ihwa Ŭidae chi. 1993;16(2):133-143.   Published online July 24, 2015
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    A Study on Psychological Ego Defense Mecanisms Differences Among Age Groups
    Ihwa Ŭidae chi. 1993;16(2):133-143.   Published online July 24, 2015
    Close
    A Study on Psychological Ego Defense Mecanisms Differences Among Age Groups
    A Study on Psychological Ego Defense Mecanisms Differences Among Age Groups
    TOP