• Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
JOURNAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Page Path

Original Article

Ultrasonic and Radiographic Cholecystography

The Ewha Medical Journal 1979;2(4):211-215. Published online: July 24, 2015

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Nan Ho Kyung. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Korea.

Copyright © 1979. Ewha Womans University School of Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 24 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
  • The authors analyzed 34 patients admitted to Ewha Womans University Hospital from January, 1, 1979 to June, 30, 1979 by animpression of cholelithiasis clinically. Ultrasonic and radiologic cholecystography were performed in all patients. In 20 patients of 34 patients, exploration was done. The result were as follow: 1) The accuracy of gallstone detected by ultrasound was 90%, which confirmed by exploratory laparotomy (20 cases), but 88% in non-visualized gallbladder by oral cholecystography(20 cases). False positive was 6%(1 case) and false negative was 6%(1 case). 2) In 13 cases(38%) GB stone was visualized by oral cholecystography, while in 20 cases(59%) were nonvisualized gallbladder by oral cholecystography(20 cases). False positive was 6%(1 case) and false negative was 6%(1 case). 3) In 20 cases that gall bladder wasn't visualized by oral cholecystography, gall stone was detected in 17 cases(85%), normal GB in 2 cases(10%), no stone in 1 case(5%) by ultrasonography. 4) Among 20 cases which were confirmed by operation, 4 cases were concomitant with cholecystography, ultrasonography and operative findings. Among 16 cases nonvisualized by oral cholecystography, 15 cases were detected as gall stone by ultrasonography, which were gall stone in 14 cases, normal gall bladder in 1 case(i.e. false positive, 6%) and no stone in 1 case(i.e. false negative, 6%)

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Download Citation

      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:

      Include:

      Ultrasonic and Radiographic Cholecystography
      Ihwa Ŭidae chi. 1979;2(4):211-215.   Published online July 24, 2015
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Ultrasonic and Radiographic Cholecystography
      Ihwa Ŭidae chi. 1979;2(4):211-215.   Published online July 24, 2015
      Close
      Ultrasonic and Radiographic Cholecystography
      Ultrasonic and Radiographic Cholecystography
      TOP