• Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
JOURNAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Page Path

Original Article

The Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy

The Ewha Medical Journal 2004;27(1):21-26. Published online: March 30, 2004

Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans university, Korea.

*Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Korea.

Copyright © 2004. Ewha Womans University School of Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 32 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
  • Objectives
    The purpose of study is to compare the laparoscopic appendectomy with the open appendectomy in the clinical outcomes.
  • Methods
    From March 2001 to June 204, a total 118 appendectomy were retrospectively reviewed. These were comprised of 57 laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), and 61 open appendectomy (OA) selected by random method among 1193 poen appendectomy cases during same period. Hospital stay, length of operation times, recovery of bowel function, postoperative complication, postoperative pain, pathologic classification were compared in both groups.
  • Results
    The operation times were 68.6 minutes (LA) and 51.6 minutes (OA), respectively (p=0.021). There no statistical differences in the duration of hospital stay, recovery of bowel function, complication rate, although LA group trend the shorter duration of the hospital stay, faster recovery of bowel function and low rarte of complication than OA group. The patient's satisfaction was higher in LA group than OA because of the operation wound scar.
  • Conclusions
    The LA was no difference clinical outcomes except operation time as compared with OA. LA, however, may be have the merit of minimal invasive surgery and satisfaction of patient. So, LA method is attractive option for the management of appendicitis.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Download Citation

      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:

      Include:

      The Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy
      Ihwa Ŭidae chi. 2004;27(1):21-26.   Published online March 30, 2004
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      The Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy
      Ihwa Ŭidae chi. 2004;27(1):21-26.   Published online March 30, 2004
      Close
      The Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy
      The Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy
      TOP